Institute for Public Accuracy
980 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
___________________________________________________
ROB RICHIE, http://www.fairvote.org
Richie is executive director of FairVote and co-author of "Every
Vote Equal" and "Whose Votes Count." He outlined eight points toward
better elections:
1) "Non-partisan election officials: It hardly matters whether the
method of voting is with paper and pen or open-source computerized
equipment if election administrators are not trustworthy. In 2004, the
secretaries of state overseeing elections in three battleground states
-- Ohio, Missouri, and Michigan -- were co-chairs of their state's
George Bush reelection campaigns. In Missouri, that Secretary of State
was running for governor -- he oversaw elections for his own race! A
highly partisan Republican Secretary of State ran elections in Florida,
as did a partisan Democrat in New Mexico. Election administrators should
be civil servants who have a demonstrated proficiency with technology,
running elections and making the electoral process transparent and secure.
2) "National elections commission: The U.S. leaves election
administration to administrators in more than 12,000 counties scattered
across the nation with too few standards or uniformity. ...
3) "Universal voter registration: We lack a system of universal voter
registration in which citizens who turn 18 years of age automatically
are registered to vote by election authorities. This is the practice
used by most established democracies, giving them voter rolls far more
complete and clean than ours. ...
4) "'Public Interest' voting equipment: Currently voting equipment is
suspect, undermining confidence in our elections. The proprietary
software and hardware are created by shadowy companies with partisan
ties who sell equipment by wining and dining election administrators
with little knowledge of voting technology. ...
5) "Holiday/weekend elections: We vote on a busy workday instead of on a
national holiday or weekend (like most other nations do), creating a
barrier for 9 to 5 workers and also leading to a shortage of poll
workers and polling places. Puerto Rico typically has the highest voter
turnout in the United States -- and makes Election Day a holiday.
6) "Ending redistricting shenanigans by adopting forms of proportional
representation: Most legislators choose their voters during the
redistricting process, long before those voters get to choose them. More
than 97 percent of U.S. House incumbents have won re-election since
1996, overwhelmingly by landslide margins. The driving factors are
winner-take-all elections compounded by rigged legislative district
lines. ...
7) "Establish the National Popular Vote plan for president: The current
winner-take-all rules governing the Electoral College in states enable
presidential campaigns to completely ignore most states in general
elections. ... States have the power by 2012 to guarantee election of
the candidate who wins the most popular votes in all 50 states by
joining several states that have adopted the National Popular Vote plan
for president.
"Pry open our democracy: Our 'highest vote-getter wins' method of
electing executive offices creates incentives to keep third-party
candidates off the ballot. ... Controversies of the New Jersey
governor's race is the latest example of how our system is not designed
to accommodate three or more choices, yet important policy areas can be
completely ignored by major party candidates. Most modern democracies
accommodate voter choice through two-round runoff or instant runoff
elections for executive offices, and proportional voting for
legislatures. Instant runoff voting is being used today in many American
elections, including city elections in Minneapolis, San Francisco, and
Pierce County, Wash."
For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020, (202) 421-6858; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
7) The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Every vote, everywhere, would be politically relevant and equal in presidential elections.
The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral votes–that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
The Constitution gives every state the power to allocate its electoral votes for president, as well as to change state law on how those votes are awarded.
The bill is currently endorsed by over 1,659 state legislators (in 48 states) who have sponsored and/or cast recorded votes in favor of the bill.
In Gallup polls since 1944, only about 20% of the public has supported the current system of awarding all of a state’s electoral votes to the presidential candidate who receives the most votes in each separate state (with about 70% opposed and about 10% undecided). The recent Washington Post, Kaiser Family Foundation, and Harvard University poll shows 72% support for direct nationwide election of the President. This national result is similar to recent polls in closely divided battleground states: Colorado– 68%, Iowa –75%, Michigan– 73%, Missouri– 70%, New Hampshire– 69%, Nevada– 72%, New Mexico– 76%, North Carolina– 74%, Ohio– 70%, Pennsylvania — 78%, Virginia — 74%, and Wisconsin — 71%; in smaller states (3 to 5 electoral votes): Delaware –75%, Maine — 77%, Nebraska — 74%, New Hampshire –69%, Nevada — 72%, New Mexico — 76%, Rhode Island — 74%, and Vermont — 75%; in Southern and border states: Arkansas –80%, Kentucky — 80%, Mississippi –77%, Missouri — 70%, North Carolina — 74%, and Virginia — 74%; and in other states polled: California — 70%, Connecticut — 74% , Massachusetts — 73%, New York — 79%, and Washington — 77%.
The National Popular Vote bill has passed 29 state legislative chambers, in 19 small, medium-small, medium, and large states, including one house in Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Maine, Michigan, Nevada, New Mexico, North Carolina, and Oregon, and both houses in California, Colorado, Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, Massachusetts, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. The bill has been enacted by Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland, and Washington. These five states possess 61 electoral votes — 23% of the 270 necessary to bring the law into effect.
See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com